Key result
Urinary proteomic panel outperforms clinical models in distinguishing acute myocarditis from AMI with ~0.95 AUC.
Why the study?
Reliable noninvasive discrimination of acute myocarditis from acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with acute chest pain remains an unmet clinical need.
Does a urinary proteomic panel distinguish acute myocarditis from acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with acute chest pain?
Observational (n=122)
Does a urinary proteomic panel distinguish acute myocarditis from acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with acute chest pain?
A novel three-protein urinary panel (TNFRSF1A, F9, PRDX3) demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing acute myocarditis from acute myocardial infarction.
Reliable noninvasive discrimination of acute myocarditis (AM) from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients presenting with acute chest pain remains an unmet clinical need. We aimed to identify urinary proteomic markers using mass spectrometry and LASSO regression. Patients with suspected AM or AMI were prospectively enrolled. Urinary proteomes were profiled by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The discovery cohort was stratified by age and sex and randomly divided into training and internal validation sets at a 3:1 ratio. Differentially expressed proteins were screened, and a diagnostic model was constructed using LASSO with 1000 bootstrap resamplings in the training set. The model was validated internally and further verified in an independent cohort using ELISA. A total of 42 AM and 80 AMI patients were included in the discovery cohort. Differential expression analysis in the training set identified 880 and 1099 differentially expressed proteins in AM and AMI, respectively, compared with controls. A three-protein panel comprising TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3 achieved an AUC of 0.954 in the training set and exceeded the clinical models (all DeLong’s P < 0.05). Addition of the protein panel to either clinical model further improved diagnostic performance (both P < 0.001). Similar performance was confirmed in the validation cohorts. A urinary proteomic panel comprising TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3 may provide a noninvasive approach for differentiating AM from AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute myocarditis and acute myocardial infarction (n=122). Urinary proteomic panel (TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3) vs. Clinical models was evaluated on Discrimination of acute myocarditis from acute myocardial infarction (AUC 0.954, p=<0.05). A urinary proteomic panel comprising TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3 distinguished acute myocarditis from acute myocardial infarction with an AUC of 0.954, exceeding clinical models (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: