Key result
SCN5A pathogenic variants were independently associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiac events in patients with Brugada syndrome (OR 11.2).
Why the study?
Interpretation and management of benign or variants of unknown clinical significance in SCN5A remain challenging in Brugada syndrome, prompting investigation into their relationship with clinical symptoms.
Does the presence of specific SCN5A variants affect the risk of cardiac events and clinical symptoms in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Observational (n=239)
No
Does the presence of specific SCN5A variants affect the risk of cardiac events and clinical symptoms in patients with Brugada syndrome?
SCN5A pathogenic variants are independent risk factors for cardiac events in Brugada syndrome, and signal-averaged ECG is useful for risk stratification in patients with variants of unknown significance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SCN5A pathogenic variants independently predict cardiac events in BrS; supports incorporating them into risk assessment while VUS prognostic value remains uncertain.
BACKGROUND: SCN5A is the most common susceptibility gene in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS); however, the interpretation and management of benign or variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS) in SCN5A remains a challenge despite the availability of genetic testing. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the SCN5A variants and clinical symptoms of BrS patients. METHODS: We resequenced the SCN5A gene in 239 patients diagnosed with BrS at Hiroshima University Hospital and analyzed the association between the SCN5A variants and clinical features, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, and signal-averaged ECG. RESULTS: Overall, 84 SCN5A variants were identified: 55 benign, 7 pathogenic, and 22 VUS. No significant difference in the incidence of previous cardiac events was observed between patients with and without SCA5A benign variants. The female proportion was higher in BrS patients with SCN5A VUS or pathogenic variants. Moreover, the symptomatic proportion was higher in BrS patients with SCN5A VUS or pathogenic variants than in those without SCN5A variants. Multivariate analyses revealed that the presence of SCN5A pathogenic variants, longer r-J intervals in lead V1, and the presence of fragmented QRS were independently associated with cardiac events in BrS patients, and that positive late potentials, longer LAS40, and lower RMS40 were significantly associated with symptomatic BrS in patients carrying SCN5A VUS. CONCLUSIONS: SCN5A pathogenic variants were found to be independent risk factors for cardiac events in BrS patients. Although SCN5A VUS was not an independent risk factor for cardiac events, proportion of symptomatic patients was higher in BrS patients with SCN5A VUS than in those without SCN5A variants. In BrS patients with SCN5A VUS, the signal-averaged ECG was the key to the risk stratification for cardiac events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okamura et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Brugada syndrome (n=239). SCN5A pathogenic variants vs. No SCN5A variants was evaluated on Symptomatic Brugada syndrome (cardiac events) (OR 11.2, 95% CI 1.5-227.4, p=0.037). SCN5A pathogenic variants were independently associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiac events in patients with Brugada syndrome (OR 11.2).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: