Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seven His2 analogs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae [Nle12]alpha-factor, WXWLQLKPGQP(Nle)Y, where X = beta-D-thienylalanine, beta-L-thienylalanine, 1-D-methylhistidine, 1-L-methylhistidine, 3-D-methylhistidine, 3-L-methylhistidine, and beta-3-L-pyridylalanine, were synthesized and purified to homogeneity. Assays were carried out on binding to the alpha-factor receptor and of biological activity determined by either growth arrest or morphological changes in target cells. In the L-isomer, replacement of the imidazole of histidine by thiophene or 3-pyridyl groups or derivatization of either nitrogen of the imidazole ring by methylation resulted in a 2-100-fold decrease in bioactivity. D-Isomers of the beta-thienylalanyl-, 1-methylhistidinyl-, or 3-methylhistidinyl-alpha-factors did not possess measurable bioactivity with the exception of comparatively low activity of the 3-D-methylhistidinyl and 1-D-methylhistidinyl-alpha-factors in the morphogenesis assay. In contrast, both active and inactive analogs demonstrated binding affinities 10-20-fold less than that of [Nle12]alpha-factor. These results indicate that the histidine residue of alpha-factor is not required for binding to the receptor or for biological activity and that bioactivity and binding can be dissociated through the use of pheromone analogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levin et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: