Key result
Application of nurse-driven clinical pathway guidelines significantly improved hemodynamic stability and reduced chest pain, dyspnea, edema, and systemic complications compared to the control group.
Why the study?
Pediatric heart failure is a complex condition, and evidence-based clinical pathways may enhance outcomes in affected children.
Does the application of a nurse driven clinical pathway guidelines improve health outcomes in children with congestive heart failure?
Does the application of a nurse driven clinical pathway guidelines improve health outcomes in children with congestive heart failure?
Implementation of a nurse-driven clinical pathway for pediatric heart failure in the PICU significantly improved hemodynamic stability, reduced symptoms, and decreased systemic complications.
Nurse-driven HF pathways may improve pediatric outcomes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Pediatric heart failure (HF) is a complicated clinical illness that has several causes as well as common disease development pathways. The developing evidence clinical pathway will most certainly enhance the outcomes of children with HF in the future. Purpose: effects of application of a nurse driven clinical pathway guidelines on selected health outcomes in children with congestive heart failure. Design: Quasi-experimental research design. Setting: pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Menoufia University Hospital, Shebine Elkom city, Menoufia Governorate. Subjects: a purposive sample of sixty children with congestive heart failure who divided into study & control groups and a convenient sample of 50 care providers including nursing staff, pediatricians, pharmacist, dietitian and physiotherapist. Tools: four tools were used; I: congestive heart failure children's assessment, II: congestive heart failure complications, III: modified clinical pathway guidelines variances checklists and IV: Nurse driven clinical pathway guidelines competency evaluation tool. Results: there was statistical significant difference between study and control groups as regards hemodynamic state, chest sound, edema, dyspnea, chest pain, systemic complications, length of stay in PICU, and variance deviations. In addition, there was statistical significant difference between competency score at pre and post clinical pathway guidelines sessions among multidisciplinary team. Conclusion: Children with congestive heart failure in study group reported a more hemodynamic stability, lower mean scores of chest pain, episodes of dyspnea and edema. Also, it contributed to no systemic complications in the majority of these children with higher positive variation than children in control group. Recommendations: replication of the study on large probability sampling
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waheda et al. (2021) studied congestive heart failure (n=60). nurse driven clinical pathway guidelines vs. control group was evaluated on hemodynamic state, chest sound, edema, dyspnea, chest pain, systemic complications, length of stay in PICU, and variance deviations. Application of nurse-driven clinical pathway guidelines significantly improved hemodynamic stability and reduced chest pain, dyspnea, edema, and systemic complications compared to the control group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: