Key result
Fetal cardiac interventions in 113 fetuses achieved technical success rates of 80% to 89% and procedure-related death rates of 7% to 20%, resulting in 98 live births.
Why the study?
The authors sought to describe the technical aspects, team preparation, and procedural modifications of the Polish fetal cardiac interventions program to improve maternal and fetal safety.
Observational (n=113)
Yes
A large national program demonstrates that fetal cardiac interventions can be performed with high technical success and result in a high rate of live births, despite inherent procedural risks.
Should remain limited to experienced centers; extends single-center technical experience but leaves open long-term fetal outcomes.
This article presents the technical aspects of the Polish fetal cardiac interventions (FCI) program, including preparation of the team and modifications in the technique of the procedure that aim to increase its safety for the mother and the fetus. Over 9 years, 128 FCI in 113 fetuses have been performed: 94 balloon aortic valvuloplasties (fBAV), 14 balloon atrioseptoplasties (fBAS) with stent (BAS+), 5 balloon atrioseptoplasties without stent placement (BAS-), and 15 fetal pulmonary valvuloplasties (fBPS). The technical success rate ranged from 80% (BAS-) to 89% (fBAV), while the procedure-related death rate (defined as death within 72 hours following the procedure) ranged from 7% (fBAV and fBPV) to 20% (BAS). There were 98 live births after all FCI (3 pregnancies continue). Median gestational age at delivery was 39 weeks in our center and 38 weeks in other centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dębska et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Fetal cardiac anomalies (n=113). Fetal cardiac interventions was evaluated on Technical success rate and procedure-related death rate. Fetal cardiac interventions in 113 fetuses achieved technical success rates of 80% to 89% and procedure-related death rates of 7% to 20%, resulting in 98 live births.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: