Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in allergic diseases as a result of increased air pollution emanating from traffic and various industries. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the association between air pollution and airway hyperresponsiveness in a cross-sectional study of a cohort of 670 children, aged 10-13 years. METHODS: We measured spirometry and conducted allergic skin tests and methacholine challenge tests in 670 schoolchildren. The methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was used as the threshold of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Thresholds of 16 mg/dl or less were assumed to indicate AHR. RESULTS: All of the schoolchildren had normal pulmonary function. Of the children, 257 (38.3%) had AHR. There was a significant increase in AHR in schoolchildren living near a chemical factory [45.0% (138/306), 6.50 +/- 0.48] compared to those in rural [31.9% (52/163), 9.84 +/- 0.83] and coastal [33.3% (67/201), 7.17 +/- 0.68] areas. Atopy was significantly more prevalent near the chemical factory vs the coastal and rural areas [35.6% (109/306) vs 27.3% (55/201) and 23.3% (38/163), respectively, P < 0.007]. Schoolchildren with atopy had lower PC20 than those without atopy (5.98 +/- 0.60 vs 8.15 +/- 0.45, P < 0.001). Positive allergy skin tests and living in a polluted area were risk factors in multivariate analyses adjusted for sex, parents' smoking habits, age, body mass index, nose symptoms and lung symptoms (odds ratio for location = 2.4875, confidence interval 1.6542-3.7406, P < 0.000; odds ratio for allergy skin test = 1.5782, confidence interval 1.1130-2.2379, P < 0.0104). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that more children living in polluted areas have airway hyperresponsiveness than do those living in less polluted areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: