The object of the present communication is to establish the fact that, in a mammal which has long been subjected to intensive and extensive laboratory investigations, constitutional factors are normally of prime importance in determining whether or not the individual organism will form a mammary tumor. In addition, constitutional factors may also play an important part in determining what general type of mammary tumor is formed. The material used is mice. It may be well, at the outset, to emphasize the fact that the type of mammary tumor to which reference is ordinarily made in this paper is the common adenoma-carcinoma series in which the epithelial elements are definitely the site of the most pronounced neoplastic development. The distinction between this group and that in which the connective tissue is most active is brought out by a comparison of the incidence of the two types in a reciprocal outcross between two inbred strains, reported by Murray and Little (1935). Cloudman has completed the histological diagnosis of each tumor tabulated. In one outcross (dBF 1 and F 2 ) using females of high mammary tumor stock, there was a total of 239 adenomas and carcinomas, with 4 fibrosarcomas. The percentage of fibrosarcomas is 1.6. In the reciprocal cross (BdF 1 and F 2 ) using females of low mammary tumor stock, among 30 tumors, mammary in position, 9 or 30.0 per cent were fibrosarcomas. The influence of constitution on the incidence of the two types is striking. Long ago Tyzzer, J. A. Murray, Bashford and others showed that mammary tumors occurred much more frequently among the descendants of tumor-forming ancestors than they did among the descendants of mice which did not form mammary tumors. These earlier writers spoke of high-tumor families or strains as contrasted with low-tumor families or strains and expressed their belief that there were constitutional differences at the basis of the distinction between the two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1936 study studied this question.