Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the use of the pseudo-spin-lattice coupled-mode (PLCM) model and the statistical Green's-function technique a phenomenological explanation of the hitherto unexplained ferroelectric phase transitions in (CH₃NH₃)Al(SO₄)₂·{}12H₂O (MASD) and (NH₄)Fe(SO₄)₂·{}12H₂O (AFeSD) alums has been given. The pseudospins assumed to be associated with the protons of the monovalent methylammonium group and the ammonium groups, respectively, in MASD and AFeSD alums undergo ordering at low temperatures. From our calculations the expression for the electrical susceptibility (χ) comes out to be of the form χ=A₀^'+B₀^'+C₀^'+⋯, where A₀^' is a temperature-independent term and B₀^' is a measure of the contribution from phonon-phonon interaction. The third term C₀^' arises from the rotation of the monovalent ions. For ferroelectric alums C₀^' is found to be highly temperature dependent, and for other nonferroelectric alums both B₀^' and C₀^' show negligibly small dependences on temperature. A single set of model parameters (Blinc---de Gennes parameters) has been calculated for AFeSD from fitting the experimental data of dielectric constant (ε), Curie-Weiss constant (C) and transition temperature (TC) with the corresponding theoretical expressions. However, in the case of MASD alum, we must vary the renormalized phonon frequency ω₀[=ω₀+Ā^'(0, T)] with temperature to fit the entire ε-T curve with a single set of model parameters. This is due to the presence of strong phonon-phonon interaction in MASD alum, causing the strongly temperature-dependent anharmonicity parameter Ā^'(0, T). The present success of the PLCM model for explaining the phase transitions in alums definitely indicates the unified character of this model, which may also be applied to many other crystals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhury et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: