This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: High-dimensional tumor profiling has the potential to refine therapeutic decisions in metastatic melanoma, especially in the beyond-standard-of-care setting, but its clinical utility remains uncertain. The Tumor Profiler Study prospectively integrated multi-platform molecular, single-cell, spatial, and functional analyses into a 4-week clinical workflow. We report the biological and clinically actionable findings from the melanoma cohort. METHODS: Tumor and blood samples from 116 patients (126 tumors) underwent comprehensive profiling including CyTOF, single-cell RNA and DNA sequencing, imaging mass cytometry, proteotyping, bulk RNA/DNA sequencing, and two ex vivo drug-response platforms. Cross-modal integration defined melanoma phenotypes and identified treatment-relevant features. RESULTS: Single-cell protein profiling of 1.7 million melanoma cells identified six recurrent melanoma phenotypes present across melanoma subtypes and oncogenic drivers. Resulting tumor phenotypes stratified patients into six CyTOF-derived groups with distinct molecular characteristics and significantly different ex vivo responses to FDA-approved therapies. TYRP1-high classical melanocytic tumors showed broad drug resistance but reproducible sensitivity to cisplatin plus vindesine, consistent with elevated p53-associated DNA damage response pathways. Conversely, melanomas with heightened unfolded-protein-response activity exhibited marked sensitivity to proteasome inhibitors, supported by transcriptomic, proteomic, and functional readouts. CONCLUSION: This study establishes a clinically annotated, single-cell–resolved multi-omic atlas of advanced melanoma that links tumor phenotypes to actionable drug vulnerabilities. These findings provide a biological rationale for biomarker-driven, phenotype-guided interventional trials aimed at improving therapeutic outcomes in metastatic melanoma.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levesque et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: