Key result
Vorapaxar significantly inhibited PAR-1-mediated platelet aggregation compared to placebo, with a maximal LTA response to TRAP of 3% vs 68% at 2 hours post loading dose (p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does vorapaxar reduce platelet reactivity and alter biomarker expression in patients with NSTE-ACS?
RCT (n=249)
Does vorapaxar reduce platelet reactivity and alter biomarker expression in patients with NSTE-ACS?
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 68%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Vorapaxar provides potent inhibition of PAR-1-mediated platelet aggregation in patients with NSTE-ACS.
Vorapaxar delivers potent PAR-1 inhibition in NSTE-ACS; confirms mechanism and supports outcome trials in acute coronary syndromes.
Vorapaxar is an antagonist of the protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), the principal platelet thrombin receptor. The Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction (TRACER) trial evaluated vorapaxar compared to placebo in non-ST-elevation (NSTE)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. It was the study's objective to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of vorapaxar versus placebo that included aspirin or a thienopyridine or, frequently, a combination of both agents in NSTE-ACS patients. In a substudy involving 249 patients, platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) in 85 subjects (41 placebo, 44 vorapaxar) using the agonists thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP, 15 μM), adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 20 μM), and the combination of collagen-related peptide (2.5 μg/ml) + ADP (5 μM) + TRAP (15 μM) (CAT). VerifyNow® IIb/IIIa and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assays were performed, and platelet PAR-1 expression, plasma platelet/endothelial and inflammatory biomarkers were determined before and during treatment. LTA responses to TRAP and CAT and VerifyNow results were markedly inhibited by vorapaxar. Maximal LTA response to TRAP (median, interquartile range) 2 hours post loading dose: placebo 68% (53-75%) and vorapaxar 3% (2-6%), p<0.0001. ADP inhibition was greater in the vorapaxar group at 4 hours and one month (p<0.01). In contrast to the placebo group, PAR-1 receptor number in the vorapaxar group at one month was significantly lower than the baseline (179 vs 225; p=0.004). There were significant changes in selected biomarker levels between the two treatment groups. In conclusion, vorapaxar caused a potent inhibition of PAR-1-mediated platelet aggregation. Further studies are needed to explore vorapaxar effect on P2Y12 inhibition, PAR-1 expression and biomarkers and its contribution to clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Storey et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) (n=249). Vorapaxar vs. Placebo was evaluated on Maximal LTA response to TRAP 2 hours post loading dose (p=<0.0001). Vorapaxar significantly inhibited PAR-1-mediated platelet aggregation compared to placebo, with a maximal LTA response to TRAP of 3% vs 68% at 2 hours post loading dose (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: