Toxic propellants have a high ground operations cost because of the potential hazards that require extensive safety precautions, particularly for reusable spacecraft. Nontoxic propellants for orbital maneuvering and reaction control systems have received periodic attention since the late 1960s as new reusable vehicles and upgrades to existing vehicles are proposed. This paper discusses the spacecraft requirements that drive propellant selections, the viable candidates for nontoxic propellants, and the system concepts and technologies required. Options for nontoxic propellants are also discussed, which are categorized as monopropellants, storable bipropellants, and cryogenic oxygen-based bipropellants. Monopropellants provide inherently simple systems and are most suited to low total impulse systems. Hydrogen peroxide and kerosene is a promising storable bipropellant in terms of its density, specie c impulse, and low toxicity for long-duration spacecraft on-orbit propulsion systems. This combination can be made hypergolic, which renders it a very effective replacement for currently used storable propellants. The hypergolic characteristics of kerosene with additives and high-concentration hydrogen peroxide are presented in detail. Higher-performance liquid oxygen and alcohol or hydrocarbon fuels are advantageous for reusable propulsion systems that emphasize e uid commonality with other spacecraft systems and for human exploration missions where in-situ propellant production is foreseen. The prospects for further research work on all of these propellants are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hurlbert et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: