How are morphogenetic gradients interpreted in terms of embryonic gene transcription patterns within a syncytium such as the Drosophila blastoderm? We propose a hypothetical model based on recent findings in the molecular biology of transcription factors. The model postulates a morphogen which is itself a spatially distributed transcription factor M or which generates a distribution of such a factor. We posit the existence of an additional, zygotically transcribed "vernier" factor V. M and V form all possible dimers: MM, MV, and VV. These are differentially translocated to the nuclei and bind with various affinities to responsive elements in the V promoter, thereby contributing to activation/inactivation of V transcription. We find four generic regimes. In order of complexity, they are as follows: (i) MM activates V; the M gradient gives rise to a sharp transcriptional boundary for V and to a secondary gradient in the concentration of protein V; (ii) MV activates V; a sharp boundary in transcription and distribution of V arises; (iii) MM and MV compete for binding; a stationary stripe of active V transcription is generated; (iv) MM and VV are in competition; a stripe of V transcription moves from one end of the embryo toward the other and may stop and/or dwindle at an intermediate position. Tentative interpretations in terms of Drosophila genes such as bicoid and hunchback are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerszberg et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: