Research Article| October 01, 1993 Sand boils without earthquakes Thomas L. Holzer; Thomas L. Holzer 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, M.S. 977, Menlo Park, California 94025-3591 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Malcolm M. Clark Malcolm M. Clark 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, M.S. 977, Menlo Park, California 94025-3591 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (1993) 21 (10): 873–876. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0873:SBWE>2.3.CO;2 Article history first online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Thomas L. Holzer, Malcolm M. Clark; Sand boils without earthquakes. Geology 1993;; 21 (10): 873–876. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0873:SBWE>2.3.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Sedimentary deformation caused by liquefaction has become a popular means for inferring prehistoric strong earthquakes. In this report, we describe a new mechanism for generating such features in the absence of earthquakes. Sand boils and a 180-m-long sand dike formed in Fremont Valley, California, when sediment-laden surface runoff was intercepted along the upslope part of a 500-m-long preexisting ground crack, flowed subhorizonally in the crack, and then flowed upward in the downslope part of the crack where it discharged as sand boils on the land surface. If the sand boils and their feeder dike were stratigraphically preserved, they could be misinterpreted as evidence for earthquake-induced liquefaction. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holzer et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: