Experimental study demonstrates tailorable degradation and upcycling of corn stover biocomposites into bacterial nanocellulose, highlighting a sustainable circular bio-economy framework.
The presented study explored the development and end-of-life evaluation of novel biocomposite materials - termed SferiCorn (Sferi) - developed using ground corn stover (CS) in the form of short fibers and three biopolymer matrices: starch (Sferi R), alginate (Sferi S), and poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBH) (Sferi BioTP). The composites were characterized in terms of thermal behavior (DSC/TGA), swelling properties, structure (FTIR), morphology (SEM), and degradation under composting, hydrolytic, and enzymatic conditions. Results showed that matrix composition strongly influenced material properties, but also guided the end-of-life options with starch-based composites degrading rapidly under composting and aqueous conditions, alginate-based composites exhibiting moderate degradability, and PHBH-based composites showing increased stability. Sferi BioTP composite, additive free, was chosen for product prototyping due to its favorable mechanical properties. Developed coat-hanger served as proof-of-concept for a sustainable and scalable product design, eliminating synthetic additives while replacing conventional plastic and metal materials with a circular, bio-based alternative. Importantly, within a circular bio-economy framework, SferiCorn biocomposites were upcycled into a new biopolymer, bacterial nanocellulose (BNC), as their hydrolysates supported markedly higher BNC yields than pure glucose media. This work demonstrated the valorization of agro-waste and the potential of using CS in application-specific biocomposites with tailorable end-of-life options. Three biocomposites were developed using CS with starch, alginate, PHBH Properties and degradation were tuned by polymer selection CS- PHBH (Sferi BioTP) proved suitable for development of a coat hanger prototype Biocomposite hydrolysates enabled BNC production, closing the multicircular loop
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ponjavić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: