Validation study demonstrates improved localization accuracy in coastal vessels using conflict-gated LiDAR-radar fusion, indicating evidence-dependent authority sustains continuous navigation.
Reliable near-coastal localization is difficult because LiDAR and scanning radar fail in complementary regimes: LiDAR provides precise local geometry but loses support over open water, whereas radar preserves long-range observations but suffers from clutter, multipath, and low spatial resolution. We present RACIF-SLAM, a reliability-aware framework that unifies continuous localization and hierarchical occupancy mapping. RACIF-SLAM transforms sensor-native motion increments into a common vessel frame, infers temporally filtered reliability from registration evidence, and applies an innovation gate to suppress the less credible modality under cross-sensor conflict before fusion on SE(2). When LiDAR tracking collapses, a radar bridge sustains motion estimation and re-anchors the recovered LiDAR segment without trajectory discontinuity. For mapping, LiDAR retains local occupied/free-space authority, while spatially broadened radar evidence extends support beyond the effective LiDAR range. In the four evaluated near-coastal segments, every reported pose was supported by at least one accepted sensor increment; the dead-reckoning fallback was not invoked. Against synchronized dual-antenna GNSS, RACIF-SLAM achieves a mean ATE of 0.700 m and a 10-frame translational RPE of 0.183 m, reductions of 66.3% and 65.1%, respectively, over the next-best evaluated method. These segment-specific results indicate that evidence-dependent authority transfer can improve localization continuity while retaining fine local map structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: