Survey study reveals distinct classes of identity-based victimization in adolescents, suggesting the need for multifaceted school intervention programs.
As awareness of biased (or, identity-based) victimization and its harmful effects on student mental health has grown, it has become widely acknowledged that biased victimization is a serious problem worthy of specialized inquiry. However, past research has seldom examined youth experiences with biased victimization in terms of common intersections of biases, leaving a gap in knowledge with implications for intervention-focused school programming. This study used U.S. survey data from 2017, 2019, and 2022 to describe students’ experiences with seven forms of biased victimization. Analyses categorized victimization experiences into a typology according to bias types (e.g. racial bias, sexual orientation bias) and determined the sociodemographic as well as incident-level correlates of the different victimization experiences. In the sample of victims ( N = 2,970), latent class analysis revealed three distinct classes, characterized by (a) low rates of all forms of biased victimization (77%); (b) primarily racial and ethnic bias (9%); and (c) multiple forms of non-racial biased victimization (14%). Student and incident characteristics were associated with odds of being in each of these classes. Results have implications for improving school-based prevention and indicate that further investigation into multiple forms of biased victimization is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allison Kurpiel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: