Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Econometric panel analysis demonstrates improved ESG performance with board gender diversity in MENA firms, highlighting national culture as a key moderating influence.
Purpose This article investigates the impact of BGD on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance, with a particular focus on how national culture moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The study relies on a sample of 95 firms across 10 MENA countries, covering the period from 2016 to 2021. We perform our analysis using the OLS method. We then apply the 2SLS approach to control for any endogeneity bias. Findings We revealed that board gender diversity positively and significantly affects ESG performance in the MENA region. Moreover, national culture dimensions play a crucial moderating role. Particularly, we demonstrated a negative moderating effect of masculinity and a positive moderating effect of uncertainty avoidance and individualism on the relationship. Our findings are robust when employing alternative measures and after controlling for endogeneity. Originality/value No previous study has explored the critical link between board gender diversity and ESG performance in the MENA region. Therefore, our insights carry significant contributions for policymakers, business leaders and researchers seeking to improve and strengthen ESG performance based on the specificities of gender diversity, particularly within the distinct cultural context of the MENA region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sbai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: