Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review traces 25 years of global social policy frameworks across transnational welfare systems, highlighting the need to decolonize scholarship and tackle emerging climate and digital risks.
Celebrating 25 years of Global Social Policy , this article reflects on the evolution of global social policy as a field of research and practice. We trace the field’s origins in debates on globalisation and the influence of international organisations on national welfare systems, highlighting how successive crises and policy agendas have shaped global social policy scholarship and practice. We review key policy themes such as pensions, health, social protection, cash transfers, migration, gender and universalism, while also identifying emerging concerns around climate change, eco-social policy, digitalisation and artificial intelligence. The article further assesses GSP ’s contribution to theoretical and conceptual debates, including policy diffusion, ideational approaches, and multi-scalar analyses of social policy change. We conclude by reflecting on persistent challenges, notably the need to strengthen Global South perspectives and decolonise the field, while arguing that global social policy remains essential for addressing increasingly transnational risks and inequalities in an era of geopolitical uncertainty and multilateral retrenchment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulriksen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: