Thematic analysis reveals organizational deviance sustained by hierarchy and mutual dependency in correctional settings, highlighting the need for systemic oversight over individual blame.
Despite the extensive literature on organizational deviance, little is known about how such behaviors emerge and persist through relational dynamics in correctional settings in Türkiye. Drawing on 284 newspaper-reported cases (2000–2025), this study employs thematic analysis to examine the relational production of deviance in inmate–staff interactions. The findings demonstrate that deviance is collectively and institutionally sustained through silence, hierarchy, and mutual dependency. Three forms are identified: deviance against inmates, deviance against the institution, and inmate-initiated deviance. The study advances the literature by conceptualizing a relational continuity–normalization–institutionalization trajectory and underscores the need for multilevel accountability, independent oversight, and ethics training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kızıldağ et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: