Multi-institutional study reveals aggressive clinical features and diverse morphology in SDHA-deficient renal cell carcinoma, highlighting the diagnostic necessity of molecular sequencing.
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is defined by mutations in SDH subunits (A, B, C, or D) and is associated with hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndrome and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in some patients. This multi-institutional study analyzed 5 SDHA-deficient RCCs using morphology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients had a median age of 40 years with male predominance (4:1). Initially, tumors were diagnosed as SDHA-deficient RCC (1), collecting duct carcinoma (1), or high-grade RCC, NOS (3). NGS subsequently identified 4 tumors as SDHA-deficient RCC. Common histologic features included papillary (100%) and nested (100%) architecture, solid growth (80%), eosinophilic/flocculent cytoplasm (100%), cytoplasmic vacuoles with inclusions (80%), and nuclear grooves (20%). Four of 5 tumors were high-grade (ISUP/WHO grade 3) with desmoplastic stroma and occasional inflammation. All tumors showed loss of SDHB expression (5/5), while SDHA expression was lost in 4/5, demonstrating that SDHA IHC may be preserved despite SDHA mutation. NGS identified SDHA mutations in four tumors. During follow-up, 2 of 4 patients developed metastases within 14 to 34 months, whereas the remaining 2 had no spread after 11 to 19 months. SDHA-deficient RCC displays a spectrum from classic SDHB-deficient RCC morphology to heterogeneous high-grade tumors. It should be considered in high-grade RCCs, particularly RCC NOS with papillary or collecting duct carcinoma-like morphology and vacuolated tumor cells. NGS is recommended, especially when SDHB loss is detected, as SDHA IHC may be retained. Unlike most SDHB-deficient RCCs, SDHA-deficient RCC appears more aggressive, with increased metastatic risk and poorer prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandukuri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: