Structural analysis reveals epitope-specific resistance mutations in relapsed multiple myeloma, highlighting the need for mutation-guided sequencing of GPRC5D therapies.
G-protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) is a leading immunotherapy target in multiple myeloma (MM), with diverse GPRC5D-targeting agents—including T-cell engagers (TCE), antibody–drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells—being evaluated clinically for relapsed/refractory MM. In a recently published relapse cohort, 13 of 19 patients treated with anti-GPRC5D therapy had acquired GPRC5D alterations, with coding single-nucleotide variants or indels in 7 of these 13 patients [ 1 ]. Because GPRC5D-directed agents can bind distinct receptor regions, a single coding variant may have different implications for different drug formats, and the same relapse biopsy can encode either a target-class exit event or a mutation that disables only one antibody footprint. Current guidance supports BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed immunotherapy sequencing but remains largely target-based rather than mutation-based [ 2 , 3 ]. Clinically, relapse must be separated into surface loss, which argues against further GPRC5D targeting, and surface-expressed epitope escape, which may preserve alternate-epitope sensitivity. This raises a clinically urgent question: when a specific GPRC5D mutation is detected at relapse, which agent should the patient receive next?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahrens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: