Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 5, 2026Cancer Survivorship Research & CareOpen Access

Use of patient-reported outcome measures in Australian pediatric oncology practice and research

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JFJoanna E. FardellCSClarissa SchilstraNBNatalie Bradford

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Survey study reveals frequent use of patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology, highlighting administrative and training barriers that impede systematic clinical adoption.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the utilization patterns, perceived utility, and implementation barriers of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among pediatric oncology healthcare professionals in Australia.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional online survey of Australian pediatric oncology healthcare providers (N = 45) recruited via purposive and snowball sampling through oncology practice groups.
  • Overall, 83% of respondents (38 of 45) reported using PROMs, with 55.3% utilizing them for research and 52.6% using them to guide clinical care.
  • PROM administration occurred predominantly via paper (47%) compared to electronic formats (26%), and only 26.3% of users had PROMs integrated into medical records.
  • Among non-users, primary barriers included a lack of suitable PROMs (85.7%) and insufficient training (42.9%), while 18.4% of users reported uncertainty regarding PROM administration or interpretation.

Cite This Study

Fardell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9bd4436b95aff0620ebc04https://doi.org/10.1080/28352610.2026.2725541
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share