Review demonstrates microbial mineral precipitation autonomously repairs concrete cracks in railway infrastructure, highlighting opportunities to reduce maintenance costs and extend service life.
Microbial-based self-healing concrete offers a promising approach to extending the service life of railway infrastructure by autonomously repairing cracks through biologically induced mineral precipitation. Key mechanisms are achieved through the metabolic activities of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB), ureolytic bacteria, fungi, and algae, supported by porous carriers and capsules that protect microbial viability, control activation, and enable targeted delivery of healing agents. Microbial-based self-healing performance has been evaluated through crack closure measurements, water permeability reduction, and recovery of mechanical strength, providing quantitative assessment of healing efficiency. Numerical modeling approaches help identify the governing factors that influence healing performance and enable optimization of design parameters, and machine-learning techniques provide powerful predictive capabilities for self-healing behavior, including crack closure, strength recovery, and reductions in water permeability. Field applications, such as the pioneering deployment in the Vijfeiken Tunnel and self-healing railway station structures, demonstrate significant potential for reducing maintenance needs, improving durability, and lowering environmental impact. However, future research needs to be conducted to maintain microbial viability under harsh environmental conditions, minimize associated costs and environmental impacts, experimentally validate self-healing performance under realistic service conditions, and develop intelligent predictive models to guide large-scale implementation. Effectively addressing these challenges will provide a strategic pathway for the wider adoption of microbial-based self-healing concrete in railway engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: