Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Widespread commercialization of high‐energy‐density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries is difficult due to the lithium polysulfide, Li 2 S n ( n = 4, 6, 8), shuttle effect. Efficient adsorption/conversion of Li 2 S n species on an electrocatalytic surface can suppress the shuttle effect. Modeling of the adsorption of Li 2 S n species using density functional theory (DFT) calculations has contributed significantly toward an understanding of their anchoring mechanism at a surface. Different surfaces show a unique range of binding energies for faster Li 2 S n adsorption/reaction kinetics. To predict the optimum binding energy zone, a systematic DFT study is performed on transition‐metal sulfide (TMS) surfaces including TiS 2 , VS 2 , NbS 2 , MoS 2 , WS 2 , and SnS 2 . The investigation revealed that the geometric properties at the anchoring site possibly regulate the adsorption energy of Li 2 S n species. A geometry parameter, G score , is defined as a function of bond length and number of lithium‐atom interactions between the Li 2 S n species and the binding surface. The design principle is extended to sulfur‐deficient (TMSs‐x) and edge‐exposed (TMS(100)) surfaces. The G score predicts the most effective binding energy zone distinctive to these materials—TMS (1.7–2.1 eV/ G score ≥ 2.0), TMSs‐x (2.0–2.8 eV/ G score ≥ 2.1), and TMS(100) (2.5–3.2 eV/G score ≥ 1.09).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abraham et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: