Observational (n=56)
No
TAVI is a safe and feasible alternative for high-surgical-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in the Hong Kong Chinese population, with outcomes comparable to major international trials.
INTRODUCTION: Aortic stenosis is one of the most common valvular heart diseases in the ageing population. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis are at high risk of sudden death. Surgical aortic-valve replacement is the gold standard of treatment but many patients do not receive surgery because of advanced age or co-morbidities. Recently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been developed as an option for these patients. This study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of this procedure in the Hong Kong Chinese population. METHODS: Data for baseline patient characteristics, procedure parameters, and clinical outcomes up to 1-year post-implantation in a regional hospital in Hong Kong were collected and analysed. RESULTS: . Of the patients, 92% were improved by at least one New York Heart Association functional class. Stroke and major vascular complications occurred in one (1.8%) and five (8.9%) patients, respectively. A permanent pacemaker was implanted in seven (12.5%) patients. Both hospital and 30-day mortalities were 1.8%. The 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were 12.5% and 7.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been developed as an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are deemed inoperable or high risk for surgery. Our results are very promising and comparable with those of major clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (n=56). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: