Periodic evaluation of cultivars allows researchers to evaluate genetic variation and progress made in various traits. Determining genetic gain or lack can lead researchers to develop new strategies for trait improvements. A two‐year study was initiated in 2004 to examine the changes in agronomic performance of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars released by North Dakota State University (NDSU) over the past 40 years. The experiment was conducted in North Dakota at three sites in 2004 and two sites in 2005. The study included 33 HRSW genotypes laid out in a randomized complete‐block design. Cultivars developed since 1968, three advanced lines developed by NDSU, and three cultivars released by other breeding programs were included in the study. The Canadian cultivar Marquis (released in 1911) was included for comparison purposes. Linear regression of cultivar means on year of release showed an annual increase in grain yield of 1.3% yr−1, grain‐volume weight of 0.2% yr−1, and thousand‐kernel weight of 0.3% yr−1 since 1968. There were also significant gains in lodging and disease resistance. Resistance to leaf rust (Puccinia recondita Roberge ex Desmaz. f. sp. tritici) and Fusarium head blight (Fusarium graminearum Schwabe [teleomorph Gibberella zeae (Schweinitz) Petch]) was substantially improved in genotypes released since 2002 and 2000, respectively. Therefore, we can conclude from this study that no evidence of a decline has occurred in the improvement of most agronomic traits and that breeders should be able to continue improving these traits by introgressing favorable alleles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Underdahl et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: