An impedance pulse, recorded noninvasively, has contributions due to both the change in blood volume of the arteries and to the change in the blood resistivity. Other researchers have tried to quantify the relative contributions and have either underestimated or overestimated the contributions since they did not simulate the physiological conditions. We have used an in vitro flow circulation system to more closely simulate the physiological conditions and quantify the two contributions. We find that the blood resistivity change contribution is strong enough (21.5 percent of the arterial volume change contribution) to change the morphology of the impedance pulse. There is, however, a phase difference between the two contributions. As a result of this, the blood resistivity change contribution to the height of the impedance pulse will be less than 5.5 percent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shankar et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: