The ferrocenylnucleobase conjugates [Fe(η5-C5H5){η5-C5H4CH2NMe2CH2CH2CH2[graphic omitted]H}][BF4]1 and [Fe(η5-C5H5){η5-C5H4CH2[C5H2N4(NH2)]}]2 of thymine and adenine respectively, have been prepared and their crystal and molecular structures determined. The molecular packing of the two compounds differs markedly in terms of intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions. In 1 such interactions are confined to discrete cation ⋯ anion ⋯ solvate units, whereas in 2 the hydrogen-bonding patterns are extensive and involve both the Watson–Crick and Hoogsteen donor and acceptor sites. Electrochemical studies of the interaction of 1 with nucleic acids showed that the incorporation of this single nucleoside base with the metallocene moiety enhances the binding in aqueous solution compared to a cationically charged derivative devoid of this functionality. Moreover, with immobilised nucleic acid, binding was observed exclusively for the conjugate 1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Price et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: