Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When resolving structures at nanometer scale, electron microscopes are the tools of choice. Since the invention of the electron microscope, the technology has matured into a standard technique applied in a wide variety of disciplines and laboratories. This holds especially true for scanning electron microscopes (SEMs), which have developed from room-filling equipment operated by highly specialized scientists to automated, desktop-sized, or even mobile, tools [1]. Some of the major advancements of SEMs in recent years have been (a) increases in resolution, especially at low electron landing energies [2]; (b) improvements in usability through digitalization, advances in software and tool handling, or miniaturization [3]; (c) addition of improved detection schemes such as energy- or wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX, WDX) to maximize the amount of information that can be taken from the sample [4]; and (d) combinations of electron microscopy with other microscopic techniques for correlative microscopy [5–9]. SEMs have become ubiquitous tools that are used in various environments and for many different applications; they no longer require highly specialized operators. For many SEM applications in practice, the highest achievable resolution is not required [10].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eberle et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: