Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of a video-capture projected VR system for children with acquired brain injury (ABI), and to compare their performance to that of matched healthy controls. SUBJECTS: Thirty-three children (age range: 6-11.4 years) were divided into two groups: 17 children with ABI and 16 controls matched for age, gender and maternal education. METHODS: Participants experienced three video-captured virtual environments and completed the SFQ child at the end of each specific environment. Participants with ABI experienced three virtual reality (VR) sessions over a period of 10 days. Attention was evaluated using the TEA-Ch. Upper extremity motor abilities were evaluated with the Melbourne Assessment, and self-care abilities were evaluated with the PEDI. RESULTS: The video-capture projected system differentiated between the performance of children with ABI and control participants. There was a correlation between VR performance and some attention factors and self-care abilities. No significant correlations were found between performance in the Melbourne assessment and performance within VR. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the potential of the video-capture virtual reality as a tool in the rehabilitation process of children with ABI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bart et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: