Key result
Radial access significantly increased median fluoroscopy time compared to femoral access during diagnostic coronary angiography (5.25 vs 2.9 minutes, p<0.001), whereas PCI fluoroscopy time was primarily driven by the number of stents deployed.
Why the study?
Increasing cardiac catheterization volumes raise safety concerns regarding radiation exposure, necessitating the determination of factors that prolong fluoroscopy time.
What are the procedural determinants of fluoroscopy time in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cross-Sectional (n=957)
No
What are the procedural determinants of fluoroscopy time in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention?
Radial access increases fluoroscopy time during diagnostic coronary angiography compared to femoral access, whereas during PCI, fluoroscopy time is primarily determined by procedural complexity such as the number of stents deployed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Radial access may increase fluoroscopy time in diagnostic angiography; leaves open optimal access strategies pending prospective trials.
Background & Objective: Due to increase in number of cardiac catheterization procedures safety concerns is an issue nowadays. Multiple diagnostic modalities use radiations, which also put a patient at higher cumulative radiation exposure. Therefore steps should be taken to minimize radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization. Hence determination of factors which prolong FT will result in better understanding of problem.This retrospective study was undertaken to determine factors responsible for prolong fluoroscopy time in patients undergoing coronary artery catheterization. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at catheterization Laboratory National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi from June 2014 to June 2015. Patients of either gender, aged between 18 to 90 years undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures were included. Radiation exposure time was measured in terms of fluoroscopy time. Results: A total of 957 patients were included in this study out of which 731 were of diagnostic Coronary Angiograms (CA) and 226 were of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). The mean age of the study participants was 54.12±10.89 years and majority 734(76.6%) were male. Mean fluoroscopy time (FT) in the patients subjected to PCI was 9.61±6.07 minutes while in cases for CA 4.17±4.13 minutes. FT for CA was observed significantly dependent on procedural access, operator’s experience, and LV angiogram. While FT for PCI was found dependent on number of stents deployed during the procedure. Conclusion: For invasive coronary angiographic procedures radial route increased fluoroscopy time. For percutaneous coronary intervention femoral and radial route fluoroscopy time were not significantly different. How to cite this:Mujtaba SF, Saghir T, Sial JA, Rizvi NH. Procedural determinants of fluoroscopy time in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(1):166-171. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.1.294 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mujtaba et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization (coronary angiography or PCI) (n=957). Radial access vs. Femoral access was evaluated on Fluoroscopy time (FT) for invasive coronary angiography (p=<0.001). Radial access significantly increased median fluoroscopy time compared to femoral access during diagnostic coronary angiography (5.25 vs 2.9 minutes, p<0.001), whereas PCI fluoroscopy time was primarily driven by the number of stents deployed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: