With the increasing demand for highly efficient and durable catalysts, researchers have been doing extensive research to engineer the shape, size, and even phase (e.g., hcp or fcc Co) of individual catalyst nanoparticles, as well as the interface structure between the catalyst and support. In this work, cobalt oxides were deposited on ceria with rod-like morphology (CeO 2 NR) and cube-like morphology (CeO 2 NC) and silica with sphere-like morphology (SiO 2 NS) via a precipitation–deposition method to investigate the effects of support morphology, surface defects, support reducibility, and the metal–support interactions on redox and catalytic properties. XRD, Raman, XPS, BET, H 2 -TPR, O 2 -TPD, CO-TPD, TEM, and TPR/TPO cycling measurements have been mainly employed for catalysts characterization. Compared with CeO 2 NC and SiO 2 NS supports, as well as CeO 2 NC- and SiO 2 NS-supported cobalt catalysts, CeO 2 NR counterparts exhibited enhanced reducibility and CO oxidation performance at a lower temperature. Both the apparent activation energy and CO conversion demonstrated the following catalytic activity order: 10 wt % CoO x /CeO 2 NR > 10 wt % CoO x /CeO 2 NC > 10 wt % CoO x /SiO 2 NS. These results showed a strong support-dependent reducibility, CO oxidation, and redox cycling activity/stability of the as-prepared catalysts. Moreover, the significantly enhanced catalytic CO oxidation of the 10 wt % CoO x /CeO 2 NR catalyst indicated the vital role of CeO 2 NR support with rich surface oxygen vacancies, superior oxygen storage capacity and mobility, and excellent adsorption/desorption behavior of CO and O 2 species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: