Key result
Manual thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention for NSTEMI did not significantly reduce 1-year mortality compared to PCI alone (1.69% vs 5.92%, adjusted p=0.32).
Why the study?
Does manual thrombectomy reduce overall mortality at 1 year in patients with NSTEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Observational (n=923)
Yes
Does manual thrombectomy reduce overall mortality at 1 year in patients with NSTEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.69% vs 5.92%
p-value: p=0.32
Manual thrombus aspiration during PCI for NSTEMI does not provide a mortality benefit at 1 year and is associated with increased procedural complications.
No mortality benefit seen with thrombectomy in NSTEMI PCI; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice pending randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: There are scarce data on the usefulness of manual thrombectomy among patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Early positive reports were not supported by the clinical outcome in the recent TATORT-NSTEMI (Thrombus Aspiration in Thrombus Containing Culprit Lesions in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) study. AIM: To analyze the long-term outcome of NSTEMI patients treated with manual thrombectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Polish multicenter National Registry of Drug Eluting Stents (NRDES) study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 13 catheterization laboratories in Poland that enrolled patients in NRDES Registry in 2010-2011. Patients with a diagnosis of NSTEMI were divided into two groups: those that were treated with manual thrombectomy for their primary PCI (T) and those who were not (NT). RESULTS: There were 923 patients diagnosed with NSTEMI in NRDES. Aspiration thrombectomy was used in 71 (7.7%) patients and the remaining 852 (92.3%) NSTEMI cases were treated without thrombectomy during the index PCI. Thrombectomy was more often used in patients with TIMI less than 1, thrombus grades 4 and 5 and older male patients. Percutaneous coronary interventions complications such as distal embolization and slow flow were more often observed in the thrombectomy subgroup. Overall mortality at 1 year was 1.69% in the T and 5.92% in the NT group (p = 0.24 and p = 0.32 after propensity score matching adjustment with p = 0.11 in the multivariate logistic regression model). CONCLUSIONS: There was no mortality benefit from thrombus aspiration in NSTEMI patients at 1-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siudak et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=923). Manual thrombus aspiration vs. No thrombus aspiration was evaluated on Overall mortality at 12 months (p=0.32). Manual thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention for NSTEMI did not significantly reduce 1-year mortality compared to PCI alone (1.69% vs 5.92%, adjusted p=0.32).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: