Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explored were the effects of memory, handedness, and the relative position of model and copy on the sequential behavior (starting points and stroke progressions) of children copying a set of shapes. Exp. 1 (memory) involved 46 kindergarten children; Exp. 2 (handedness), 36 kindergartners; and Exp. 3 (alignment and proximity), 20 children from each of Grades K, 2, and 4. Availability of the model had no effect; children followed the same paths when copying with the model present or with it absent. Handedness, however, affected left-right directionality, while the proximity of model and copy affected threading and, to a lesser extent, top-bottom directionality. The results are discussed in terms of implications for questions about sources of directionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehman et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: