Key result
Ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery was associated with less ICU rescue analgesia (17.5% vs 35.0%; P<0.001) and shorter ICU stays than conventional anesthesia.
Why the study?
To identify preoperative and intraoperative factors influencing the implementation of ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia and compare postoperative recovery with conventional cardiac anesthesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
Does ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia improve postoperative recovery compared to conventional cardiac anesthesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=947)
Does ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia improve postoperative recovery compared to conventional cardiac anesthesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.5% vs 35%
p-value: p=<0.001
Ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery is associated with shorter ICU and hospital stays and reduced delirium, though it increases postoperative nausea and vomiting.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze factors influencing the implementation of ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia (UFTCA) from the perspectives of preoperative and intraoperative conditions and to compare its postoperative recovery with that of conventional cardiac anesthesia (CGA). DESIGN: An observational retrospective study SETTING: Electronic medical records data for patients from January 2021 through July 2023 PARTICIPANTS: 967 patients with a documented history of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) INTERVENTIONS: Review of electronic medical records MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Data for 947 patients, including 439 who received UFTCA and 508 who received CGA, were analyzed retrospectively. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent factors associated with UFTCA implementation. Risk factor analysis showed that age >50 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.924; p = 0.040), history of stroke (OR, 2.290; p = 0.009), and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (OR, 1.013; p < 0.001), intraoperative sufentanil dosage (OR, 1.035; p < .001), and surgeries ending after 8 pm (OR, 2.184; p < 0.001) were negatively correlated with UFTCA implementation. Pectoral muscle fascial plane block (OR, 0.120; p < .001) and dexamethasone (OR, 0.438; p < .001) were positive factors in UFTCA implementation. Compared to the CGA group, the UFTCA group had fewer cases of intensive care unit (ICU) rescue analgesia (77 [17.5%] vs 178 [35%]; p < 0.001), shorter ICU stay (mean, 22.83 ± 20 hours vs 44 ± 43 hours; p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (mean, 8 ± 3 days vs 10 ± 5 d; p < .001), and lower incidence of postoperative delirium (6 [1.4%] vs 28 [5.5%]; p = 0.001) but a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (86 [19.6%] vs 62 [12.2%]; p = 0.002). The oxygenation index (OI) was lower at 1 hour postsurgery but higher at 6 hours postsurgery in the UTCA group compared to the CGA group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Seven independent factors were identified for UFTCA implementation in MICS, among which age >50 years, history of stroke, duration of CPB, intraoperative sufentanil dosage, and surgery ending after 8 pm were negative factors and pectoral muscle fascial plane block and dexamethasone use were positive factors. The use of UFTCA in MICS shortened ICU stay and hospital stay, decreased the incidence of delirium, and promoted postoperative pulmonary function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (n=947). Ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia (UFTCA) vs. Conventional cardiac anesthesia (CGA) was evaluated on Intensive care unit (ICU) rescue analgesia (p=<0.001). Ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery was associated with less ICU rescue analgesia (17.5% vs 35.0%; P<0.001) and shorter ICU stays than conventional anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: