Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CLINICAL QUESTION: Is parenteral nutrition via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) associated with better delivery of nutrition and growth and fewer adverse events compared with short peripheral cannulas in neonates? BOTTOM LINE: Compared with short peripheral cannulas, parenteral nutrition via PICCs is associated with better nutrient delivery and lower rates of subsequent catheters or cannulas placed and is not associated with increased rates of invasive infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ainsworth et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: