BACKGROUND: Tracheotomy patients who are difficult to wean from ventilation consume a substantial portion of intensive care unit (ICU) resources. These patients also typically undergo a long period of mechanical ventilation (MV) and have a high mortality rate. The efficacy of a dual-mode weaning strategy (alternation of invasive and noninvasive MV) in tracheotomy patients who are difficult to wean is unknown. METHODS: We performed this prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a 17-bed respiratory ICU from July 2009 to October 2011. After tracheotomy, patients who failed for 3 consecutive days in a spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled (n = 32) and randomly allocated to either the dual-mode (n = 15) or conventional (n = 17) weaning group. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional group, patients in the dual-mode group had a shorter duration of MV during the entire study (median 38 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 28-53 vs 59, IQR: 39-88, P = 0.03) and after randomization (median 10 days, IQR: 4-21 vs 37, IQR: 16-51, P < 0.01). They also had a shorter ICU stay (median 44 days, IQR: 32-54 vs 72, IQR: 52-102, P = 0.01), a lower mortality rate during weaning (1 of 15 vs 7 of 17, P = 0.04), and a lower rate of pulmonary infection after randomization (3 of 15 vs 12 of 17, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-mode weaning is a promising strategy for treating tracheotomy patients who are difficult to wean. In a small cohort of patients with tracheotomies, we demonstrated that dual-mode weaning reduced the total duration of MV and ICU stay; we recommend additional studies to assess its effect on pulmonary infections and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: