A paper by Andress et al. [2] attempts to summarize and respond to the data and conclusions in a paper by Berkowitz et al. [1]. In this paper, we show that their summary of our results is inaccurate and present additional evidence which confirms the original conclusions, namely, the γ-Fe2O3particles we examined were single crystals with predominantly [110] oriented longitudinal axes and symmetric cross sections. Pores and anti-phase-boundaries were the principal defects. No correlation was noted between porosity as measured from transmission electron micrographs and either coercive force or print through.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berkowitz et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: