Why the study?
Routine, rigid adherence to clinical guidelines in massive pulmonary embolism can sometimes lead to adverse outcomes, demonstrating the need for a comprehensive management approach.
Case Report (n=1)
Strict adherence to clinical guidelines in massive pulmonary embolism may not guarantee survival, highlighting the need for individualized clinical judgment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Guideline adherence may not avert fatal recurrent PE; leaves open whether individualized strategies beyond current recommendations improve outcomes.
No abstract was published with this document — society guidelines, consensus pathways, and scientific statements are typically released without one. See the Key Points and the linked PDF for the full content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lebedev et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Massive pulmonary embolism (n=1). Clinical guidelines and prognostic scales was evaluated on Fatal outcome. Strict adherence to clinical guidelines in a patient with massive pulmonary embolism did not prevent a fatal outcome from recurrent pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: