Key result
Intraoperative application of indocyanine green during bariatric surgery changed surgical decision-making in 4.2% of patients, with no reported complications.
Why the study?
Postoperative anastomotic leaks are a challenging complication of bariatric surgery, and the intraoperative utility of indocyanine green to assess tissue perfusion remains debated.
Does intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) assessment reduce anastomotic leak rates in patients undergoing bariatric surgery?
Systematic Review (n=887)
Does intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) assessment reduce anastomotic leak rates in patients undergoing bariatric surgery?
Intraoperative ICG assessment during bariatric surgery is safe and alters surgical decision-making in a small percentage of cases, though large RCTs are needed to confirm its impact on anastomotic leaks.
ICG fluorescence assessment in bariatric surgery remains debated; leaves open whether routine use reduces anastomotic leaks and requires prospective trials.
Background Post-operative anastomotic leaks (AL) are one of the most challenging complications of bariatric surgery and can be detrimental. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescence dye that can provide a real-time intraoperative assessment of organ tissue perfusion. Its use in bariatric operations is still being debated. The present review aims to evaluate the intraoperative utility of ICG during bariatric surgery to focus future research on a reliable tool to reduce the incidence of postoperative leaks. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for published studies took place until December 2024, evaluating the use of ICG during bariatric surgical procedures. Studies were included if they assessed the ICG application in various bariatric operations to prevent and reduce AL rates. Results Eleven studies were included, which involved a total of 887 patients. 643 patients underwent ICG-based intraoperative assessments, while 244 were in the control group. The mean age of participants was 43.8 years, and the mean BMI was 43.3 kg/m 3 . All included patients underwent various bariatric procedures. ICG was used alone in most studies, although it was mixed with methylene blue in one study. ICG administration protocols varied significantly. There were no reported complications from ICG administration. The utility of ICG has changed the intraoperative surgical decision-making of 4.2% of patients. Conclusions ICG is a promising technique for successfully preventing or timely managing AL in bariatric surgery. Large, randomised controlled studies are needed to confirm its utility for routine use in primary and revisional bariatric cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peristeri et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Bariatric surgery (n=887). Indocyanine green (ICG) vs. Control group (no ICG) was evaluated on Change in intraoperative surgical decision-making. Intraoperative application of indocyanine green during bariatric surgery changed surgical decision-making in 4.2% of patients, with no reported complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: