Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: Based on the recent FIGO recommendations, we wish to report on preservation of the uterus in a patient with placenta increta by applying the leaving the placenta in situ approach.Methods: A 30-year-old gravida 2, Para 1 was referred at 25 + 5 gestational weeks due to a placenta previa bipartita increta diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound, a history of a cesarean and vaginal bleeding. After informed consent, the parents opted for conservative treatment. The patient was admitted and the options of treatment were communicated within a multidisciplinary team. At 31 + 4 gestational weeks, severe recurrent hemorrhage led to a repeat cesarean.Results: A boy of 1910 g was delivered and the placenta was left in situ. Estimated blood loss was <200 ml. An MRI on day 13 still showed regular placental circulation, but after 4 weeks, perfusion and HCG levels had significantly decreased. The patient was examined every 3 days and readmitted after 6 weeks with a sudden rise of d-dimers. Within 24 hours, the complete placenta was delivered. On postoperative day 54, MRI confirmed uterine involution without a placental tissue.Conclusions: Delayed placental delivery in patients with abnormal placental invasion is a legitimate option to preserve fertility and possibly to reduce intrapartum hemorrhage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boekhoff et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: