Key result
Literature review identifies 44 distinct descriptions of advanced multimorbidity, reflecting highly variable clinical definitions.
Why the study?
There is no accepted method to identify when individuals with deteriorating health from long-term conditions are nearing the end of life or could benefit from a palliative care approach.
There is a lack of a standardized definition for Advanced Multimorbidity, highlighting the need for consensus to better identify patients who could benefit from a palliative care approach.
Varied definitions of advanced multimorbidity may impede palliative care identification; leaves open the need for consensus on standardized criteria.
Introduction: Multimorbidity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased symptom burden and healthcare utilisation, particularly towards the end of life. Despite this, there is no accepted method to identify the point at which individuals with deteriorating health due to long-term conditions are nearing the end of life or might benefit from a palliative care approach - conceptualised as 'Advanced Multimorbidity'. This scoping review explored how Advanced Multimorbidity is described and operationalised within the literature. Methods: Multiple electronic databases and Grey Literature sources were searched following scoping review frameworks. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction. Content analysis was used to examine the different descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity. Stakeholder consultations were undertaken with clinicians, academics and public participants. Patient and public involvement was separately integrated throughout this review from conceptualisation, design and reporting. Results: Forty-four different descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity were identified from 38 publications. These varied in terms of the clinical conditions and descriptors used. Eighteen descriptions relied on a single indicator to identify Advanced Multimorbidity; 24 used a multidimensional approach. Stakeholder consultations highlighted the need for descriptions that are user-friendly and actionable. Conclusion: The lack of a standardised definition of Advanced Multimorbidity risks variance in clinical and research practice, potentially affecting patient care. A consensus on defining Advanced Multimorbidity would enable better identification of patients who could benefit from a palliative care approach, ensuring more consistent and person-centred care, as well as supporting research and policy development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowers et al. (2025) conducted a review in Advanced Multimorbidity (n=38). Advanced Multimorbidity descriptions was evaluated on Descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity. A scoping review identified 44 different descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity across 38 publications, with 18 relying on a single indicator and 24 using a multidimensional approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: