Reaction of CuCl2·2H2O or CuBr2 with the tridentate ligand 4-methyl-2,6-bis(pyrrolidin-1-yl-methyl)phenol (Hmbpp) in methanol yielded two copper(II) complexes [Cu4OCl4(mbpp)2]·2MeOH 1 and [Cu4OBr4(mbpp)2]2. They were characterised by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. Both structures were solved using direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix least squares. They consist of a tetrahedron of copper atoms centred by a µ4-bridging oxygen atom. Magnetic susceptibility measurements in the temperature range 7.0–487.3 K indicated significant antiferromagnetic coupling between the copper(II) centres of both complexes. The experimental data were fitted to a modified Heisenberg model by analysing the tetranuclear complexes as two dinuclear Cu2O2 subunits. The best least-squares fit parameters were g= 2.12(2), J12=–275(1) cm–1, J13=–27.8(5) cm–1 and xp= 1.0(1)% paramagnetic impurity for 1 and g= 2.10(2), J12=–261(1) cm–1, J13=–21.6(5) cm–1 and xp= 1.2(1)% for 2. By comparison to similar µ4-oxo-bridged copper(II) complexes, a linear relationship between the magnetic intradimer coupling constant and the mean Cu–O–Cu angle is obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reim et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: