Key result
Established cardiovascular disease independently predicted a higher risk of all-cause death in the ICU compared to lower CVD risk (HR 2.084; 95% CI 1.136-3.823; p=0.018).
Why the study?
Critically ill patients with cardiovascular disease may have a lower threshold for decompensation and compromised adaptive mechanisms, prompting an assessment of CVD's prognostic impact in the ICU.
Does established cardiovascular disease or high CVD risk increase mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit?
Cohort (n=296)
Does established cardiovascular disease or high CVD risk increase mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Established cardiovascular disease or high CVD risk is highly prevalent in ICU patients and independently predicts a two- to three-fold higher risk of death during hospitalization.
Background Care for the critically ill patient with Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) requires a unique management approach, as the theoretical critical threshold for decompensation is lower and inherent adaptive mechanisms may be compromised. We aimed to characterize the prognostic impact of CVD in patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods We performed a cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to an ICU from January to December 2019. Patients were stratified as follows: (1) established CVD – presence of either atrial fibrillation, heart failure, coronary artery disease and/or peripheral artery disease; (2) at higher risk of CVD – known arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus and/or current smoking, in the absence of established CVD; and (3) at lower risk of CVD – i.e. none of the above. The co-primary endpoints were all-cause death in ICU and death during index hospitalization. Results During 2019, there were 334 admissions in ICU, comprising a total of 296 patients (mean age 67±15 years, 58.1% male). Overall, 69 (23.3%) and 108 (36.5%) died in ICU and during index hospitalization, respectively. Compared to patients at lower risk of CVD, those at higher CVD risk or with established CVD had markers of more severe disease, as noted by higher risk scores (e.g., SAPS-II 35.0±20.0 vs. 43.5±22.3 vs. 52.6±20.0; p<0.001), higher rates of mechanical ventilation (41.5 vs. 57.3 vs. 63.9%; p=0.020), shock during ICU stay (34.0 vs. 52.7 vs. 66.9%; p<0.001) and acute kidney injury (26.4 vs. 35.5 vs. 57.9%; p<0.001), respectively, as well as higher death rates in ICU (5.7 vs. 21.8 vs. 31.6%; p=0.001) and index hospitalization (9.4 vs. 37.3 vs. 46.6%; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, adjusted for age and cause of admission, established CVD independently predicted the risk of all-cause death in ICU (HR: 2.084; 95% CI: 1.136–3.823; p=0.018) and during index hospitalization (HR 1.712; CI: 1.009–2.889; p=0.046). The analysis for the group of patients at higher risk of CVD yielded similar results to the abovementioned. Conclusion Roughly 4 in every 5 patients admitted in ICU were at risk of or had established CVD. The presence of either of the above independently predicted a two- to three-fold higher risk of death during hospitalization. Our findings emphasize the considerable burden of CVD in ICU and underscore the importance of comprehensive management of the complex critically ill patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocha et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Critically ill patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (n=296). Established cardiovascular disease vs. Lower risk of cardiovascular disease was evaluated on All-cause death in ICU (HR 2.084, 95% CI 1.136-3.823, p=0.018). Established cardiovascular disease independently predicted a higher risk of all-cause death in the ICU compared to lower CVD risk (HR 2.084; 95% CI 1.136-3.823; p=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: