Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vaseygrass (Paspalum urvillei Steud.) is a weed in environments where limpograss [Hemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf & Hubb.] is a productive pasture grass. The objective of this study was to determine grazing management and N fertilization effects on persistence of vaseygrass in limpograss pastures on a Pomona sand (sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Ultic Alaquod). Treatments were arranged in a split‐plot experiment; combinations of grazing method (continuous vs. rotational) and stubble height (15 and 30 cm) were the main plots, and N fertilization (50 and 150 kg N ha−1) was assigned to subplots. Continuous stocking for two grazing seasons reduced vaseygrass cover by 15 percentage units (−3 units for rotational) and increased limpograss cover by 6 units (−8 units for rotational). A stubble height × N rate interaction occurred because at the shortest height and lowest N rate the decline in vaseygrass cover (15 units) and increase in limpograss cover (7 units) were most pronounced. After 2 yr of continuous stocking, vaseygrass stem‐base mass was lower than for rotational stocking (12 vs. 23 g plant−1), and stem‐base (0.40 vs. 0.78 g plant−1) and root (0.46 vs. 0.91 g plant−1) content of total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) were lower under continuous compared to rotational stocking, respectively. Grazing to a 15‐ vs. 30‐cm stubble height resulted in lower vaseygrass stem‐base mass (12 vs. 23 g plant−1) and TNC content (0.44 vs. 0.73 g plant−1). Continuous stocking reduced vaseygrass plant mass and density while limpograss cover increased, but careful management of stubble height is required to avoid subsequent invasion by other undesirable species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Newman et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: