Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both digital subtraction and recursive filtering schemes have been employed successfully for intravenous and intraarterial arteriography. Either processing method results in an image(s), S, which is a linear combination of discrete images Ij acquired during the flow of iodinated contrast material, i.e., S = Sum of k(j)l(j) from j = 0 to N where k(j) are the weighting coefficients for the N+1 samples. It is shown that for a given set of images {l(j)} there exists a set of weighting coefficients {k(j)} which maximizes the iodine signal to noise ratio and simultaneously removes stationary background anatomy. The k(j) are related to the contrast dilution curve measured over an artery of interest, k(j) = s[j]-Mean(s), where {s[j]} is the set of measured image variations due to the flow of contrast material, and Mean(s), is the mean value of the s[j]. This choice of k(j) defines a matched filter. Compared to subtraction angiography, matched filtering is 4-6 times more dose efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruger et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: