The orientation factor, K, of elastic dislocation energy is calculated for dislocations in KDP (space group I42d) with Burgers vectors b = 〈100〉, [001], 〈110〉, 〈011〉, and 1/2〈111〉. As a result of elastic anisotropy, for dislocations with b = 〈110〉, K has an absolute maximum in pure screw orientation. The preferred line directions characterized by a minimum elastic energy per unit growth length, W, are calculated for nine types of dislocations in (011) and (010) growth sectors; seven of them are identified by X-ray topography. The agreement of observed and calculated line directions is satisfactory except for dislocations with b = [011] in the (011) growth sector. Because of W having a very weak minimum in this case, it is suggested that the position that the position of these dislocations is influenced by a variation of dislocation core energy with direction that has been neglected in the calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klapper et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: