Key result
MitraClip implantation significantly reduced regurgitant severity in patients with degenerative (P<0.001), functional (P=0.003), and mixed (P<0.001) mitral regurgitation in the short-term.
Why the study?
Does MitraClip implantation alter mitral annular geometry differently depending on the mechanism of mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=46)
Does MitraClip implantation alter mitral annular geometry differently depending on the mechanism of mitral regurgitation?
MitraClip repair induces different changes in mitral annular geometry depending on the regurgitant mechanism, but these differences do not impact short-term reduction in regurgitation or clinical improvement.
Short-term MR reduction with MitraClip occurs across etiologies; leaves open whether mechanism-specific annular geometry changes affect durability.
BACKGROUND: MitraClip® therapy is an alternative to conventional surgery. The aim was to characterize the mitral annular geometry pre- and postrepair with the MitraClip® taking into account the regurgitation mechanism. METHODS: We retrospectively collected pre- and postprocedural transesophageal echocardiography data in 46 patients. Patients were categorized as having isolated degenerative (DMR, n = 18), isolated functional (FMR, n = 9) or a combination of both functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation (MMR, n = 19). RESULTS: A significant reduction in septolateral (SL) diameters in all patients occurred. Noteworthy, in those with DMR, there was no significant change in intercommissural (IC) diameters whereas in those with FMR and MMR, it increased significantly in systole (FMR: +2.8 ± 3.4 mm, P = 0.03, MMR: +2.1 ± 2.6 mm, P = 0.002). In DMR, a significant reduction in mitral annular areas post-procedure was observed (-1.8 ± 2.3 cm(2), P = 0.001 in diast., -0.8 ± 1.0 cm(2), P = 0.004 in syst.). In patients with FMR and MMR, though the SL diameter decreased, this occurred at the expense of an increase in IC diameter causing a change in annular shape but leaving the annular area unchanged. Nevertheless, a comparable reduction in regurgitant severity (DMR: P = <0.001; FMR: P = 0.003; MMR: P = <0.001) and improvement in functional class occurred regardless of regurgitant mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Though changes in mitral annular geometry after MitraClip® repair differ depending on regurgitant mechanism, this does not appear to have an impact on residual regurgitation or clinical status in the short-term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
REMY et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Functional and Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation (n=46). MitraClip implantation vs. Pre-procedure baseline was evaluated on Change in mitral annular geometry and regurgitant severity. MitraClip implantation significantly reduced regurgitant severity in patients with degenerative (P<0.001), functional (P=0.003), and mixed (P<0.001) mitral regurgitation in the short-term.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: