Key result
Bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes show sex differences, with aortic insufficiency peaking at ~44% in LN men.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether associations between bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes, valve disease, and aortopathy differ between sexes.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,045)
Yes
There are significant sex differences in the associations between bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes and the prevalence of specific valve diseases and aortopathy, highlighting the need for sex-specific considerations in patient management.
May inform sex-stratified surveillance in bicuspid aortic valve; hypothesis-generating and requires longitudinal validation.
OBJECTIVE: Determine whether associations between bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) phenotypes, valve disease and aortopathy differ between sexes. METHODS: 1045 patients with BAV (76.0% men, n=794) from two surgical centres were included in this cross-sectional study. Valve phenotype was classified intraoperatively as right-left (RL), right-non-coronary (RN), left-non-coronary (LN) or 2-sinus BAV. Echocardiography was used to determine type and degree of valve disease, and aortic dimensions. Aortic dilatation was defined as diameter ≥4.5 cm. RESULTS: RL was the most common phenotype (73.6%), followed by RN (16.2%), 2-sinus BAV (9.2%) and LN (1.1%), with no difference in phenotype distribution between men and women (p=0.634). Aortic valve insufficiency (AI) prevalence differed significantly with valve phenotype in men (p=0.047), with RL and LN having the highest prevalence (34.1% and 44.0%, respectively). In women, RN had a higher proportion of AI than RL (21.3% vs 7.3%, p=0.017). Men with RL had larger root dimensions, in particular at the sinus (mean difference 0.24 cm compared with RN, p=0.002). Men with 2-sinus BAV had the highest prevalence of root phenotype dilatation (7.0%, other phenotypes ≤2.3%, p=0.031), whereas women with 2-sinus BAV did not have root dilatation and smaller sinus dimensions (mean difference: 0.35 cm compared with RL, p=0.021). Aortic root segments were larger in men with AI compared with aortic stenosis (sinus mean difference: 0.40 cm, p<0.001). The difference was even larger in women (mean difference: 0.78 cm, p<0.001), and women with AI also had larger tubular segments (mean difference: 0.61 cm, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant sex differences in clinical associations of BAV phenotypes, which should be considered in further studies on the role of phenotypes in individualised patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Granath et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) (n=1,045). Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) phenotypes vs. Between sexes and phenotypes was evaluated on Type and degree of valve disease, and aortic dimensions. Bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes showed significant sex differences, with aortic insufficiency prevalence highest for RL (34.1%) and LN (44.0%) in men, but higher for RN (21.3%) than RL in women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: