This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction Molecular subtyping of breast cancer, particularly the discrimination between Luminal A and Basal-like tumours, is critical for guiding treatment decisions and establishing prognosis. Radiomics offers a promising complementary, non-invasive imaging biomarker to support biopsy-based subtyping; however, two methodological gaps limit the validity of existing studies: the absence of controlled 2D-vs.-3D feature comparisons, and the systematic underreporting of patient-level data leakage in multi-slice pipelines. Methods To address both limitations, this study benchmarks slice-level (2D) and volumetric (3D) radiomic pipelines for the classification of Luminal A vs. Basal-like tumours on the TCGA-BRCA cohort, evaluating seven classifiers combined with two feature selection strategies under a Stratified Group k -Fold ( k = 5) cross-validation scheme that enforces strict patient-level isolation. Results The 3D pipeline achieved a mean AUC of 0.682 vs. 0.631 for the 2D pipeline. In the 3D configuration, the Support Vector Machine with SelectKBest-MI feature selection attained the highest performance (AUC = 0.768 ± 0.066), while the 2D configuration was led by Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.769 ± 0.109), albeit with substantially higher fold-to-fold variability. Six out of seven classifiers yielded higher AUC scores under the 3D configuration, although a paired significance test on fold-level AUC values did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.313). Discussion These results establish a reproducible, leakage-free baseline for non-invasive breast cancer subtype classification through radiomics, with 3D radiomics offering improved robustness rather than superior peak performance. Results are derived from a single cohort (TCGA-BRCA) and external validation is required before clinical generalizability can be claimed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: